A multi-entity organisation, in its simplest form, is any business that operates with more than one legal entity. Although this sounds straightforward, multi-entity organisations face complications, such as separate VAT returns, filing a separate set of accounts, and complex consolidation.
Shutterstock
There are a few different types of multi-entity organisations commonly found in the Property sector. We’ve outlined the three most common types below:
- Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV): The property asset or development is held in a separate legal entity. This drives tax efficiency and is dependent on lender requirements or investor structuring.
- Joint ventures: Two or more parties co-own an entity, often with different ownership percentages and different reporting obligations for each partner. Minority interest accounting and partner reporting are common complexities here.
- Management company structure: One central entity provides management services to all property entities beneath it, creating lots of intercompany management charges and other recharges across the group.
If you operate as a group organisation, you typically add a layer of complexity to financial management. But why? And how can you avoid these challenges as you scale?
Get in touch with our dedicated team or visit our market page to learn how Xledger supports complex group structures and multi-entity accounting.
Why does this add a layer of complexity to finance?
Operating multiple entities, particularly SPVs, has its advantages, but the entities must be managed diligently to avoid regulatory non-compliance. For example, finance teams must produce separate accounts for each entity, all with specific deadlines and compliance rules.
This can create vast amounts of work when a central finance team manages all other entities. Despite needing to produce separate accounts, finance will need one consolidated view of the group to comply with UK regulations at the entity and group level, such as His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), Companies House, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), Construction Industry Scheme (CIS), and value-added tax (VAT).
These problems multiply when a property management company scales without flexible finance software. Tools and processes that work well for single-entity companies often fail to work at scale across multiple SPVs or joint ventures, and, without scalable software, finance teams are forced to manually reconcile and consolidate across all entities.
Want to listen to the whole conversation? Watch the full webinar here.
Common challenges affecting multi-entity finance teams in property management
Complex consolidation requirements across entities are a common challenge seen across property management businesses of all sizes. Whether you manage a growing portfolio, joint ventures, or SPVs, pulling together a consolidated live view of the company can become an onerous task.
Another common challenge for property management finance teams is managing intercompany transactions. Every transaction charged from one entity in the group to another needs to be recorded on both balance sheets and then also eliminated at the group level.
In practice, finance teams without scalable software have to manually post the same transaction multiple times in multiple entities. In organisations with individual finance teams for each entity, this can delay reconciliation and introduce inaccuracies to the balance sheet due to human input errors.
Finance teams are left asking:
- Why are there differences across entities for the same transaction?
- Are there duplicates?
- Did we forget to post an entry in one of the entities?
- Should this have existed in the first place?
“For most finance teams without scalable systems, consolidation isn’t a process; it’s a project that consumes multiple days every single month.”
Sam Dodge, Solutions Manager, Xledger UK.
Over-reliance on Excel spreadsheet reporting is also a major obstacle that finance teams must navigate. Once this style of reporting is embedded into daily finance tasks, it can be extremely difficult to modernise processes.
Many businesses in the sector lean on Excel as a consolidation engine, pulling data from multiple systems, putting it into spreadsheets, then reformatting with complex formulas. Unfortunately, this leads to errors that are then imported back into business systems, again requiring finance’s time to manually find and fix these data errors.
Other common challenges for multi-entity property management finance teams include:
- Duplication effort
- Ever-evolving company structures
- Regulatory non-compliance
- New reporting requirements brought in by finance leaders
- Staff turnover and a loss of spreadsheet understanding
- Obsolescence of legacy systems
- Demotivation and job dissatisfaction
What to evaluate when assessing finance systems
Xledger. All rights reserved.
1. Multi-entity architecture
Property management finance systems that are built using a hierarchical structure cater directly to multi-entity accounting. Typically, bolt-on architecture duplicates data entries across separate systems, meaning that consolidation still requires some manual effort.
However, native multi-entity architecture means that every entity lives within a single, consolidated system, sharing the same rule-based consolidation built into the system’s core, not layered on top. For property groups managing multiple entities across different currencies, whether GBP, EUR, or other currencies further afield, the distinction is a system that automatically consolidates and solves problems.
2. Real-time reporting and automated consolidation
Automated consolidation eliminates month-end pain by ensuring all data is live and reportable. Shifting finance’s access from periodic reporting data to real-time visibility improves the quality of decisions made at the operational, board, and investor levels.
Leveraging a system that automatically posts corresponding management fees, for example, greatly reduces the time that finance has to spend balancing intercompany accounts. As a result, finance is free to utilise the real-time data in front of them, confident that the numbers are trustworthy and up-to-date.
3. Configurable, role-based access to a unified system
Maintaining visibility and security across entities is simplest when all entities sit within a single unified database. With role- and entity-based access, finance leaders can rest assured that their accountants see appropriate entities, external auditors access a read-only controlled view of the system, and designated managers can oversee the entire group.
4. Integrated project, procurement, and approval workflows
Property management involves significant operational activity, and having a fully integrated project procurement and approval workflow supports accounting tasks, such as service charge budgets, capital expenditure approvals, and refurbishment project management.
When workflows sit outside of the accounting system, finance leaders lose control. But a fully integrated and automated property management finance system prevents this lack of visibility. It promotes in-system accounting, budget accountability, and cross-department collaboration.
5. Audit-ready environment with traceability
Audit readiness underpins all other considerations in this list. In an audit-ready environment, finance can approach year-end with confidence and provide auditors with read-only access to their system to streamline the audit process. Plus, demonstrating regulatory compliance becomes far easier when armed with an automated, unalterable audit trail.
Ready to redesign your financial processes?
If you’re a property management finance leader, book your free demo with our accountancy-trained solutions consultants. Get in touch with our dedicated team to learn how Xledger can support your complex group structure through native multi-entity architecture and automated, real-time consolidation.
+44 (0)7442 911 588