The Thanksgiving melt-up arrived on cue, the market carving gains like a holiday turkey — yet thin enough that you could steer the entire tape with a dessert fork.
The , , and just logged their best four-day stretch since May — the kind of pre-holiday levitation that looks impressive on the scoreboard but feels suspiciously engineered underneath, given that S&P volume sat roughly 11% below its 30-day norm. A few determined buy programs — or in this case, the AI-enchanted faithful returning to the pews — were enough to drag the entire tape higher.
And yet, for all the post-shutdown statistical noise, you can’t miss the real engine under the hood: the market has welded itself to the narrative. Every soft note out of the Fed — the gentler cadence, the dovish hum, the conspicuous absence of any Powell-via-WSJ or FT pushback from the usual Fed whisperers — is being treated as gospel confirmation that the policy tide is not just turning, but accelerating. Even the capitulated, collapsing 35% in four sessions, folding like a beach chair in a monsoon gust — its sharpest implosion since mid-April. Fear has left the building; FOMO has seized the controls.
Tech once again did the heavy lifting because, of course, it did. snapped back from those fleeting “Google-might-eat-our-lunch” jitters in classic heavyweight fashion. If you look at the sprawling lay of the AI land, we aren’t even in a real competition cycle — we’re still in the AI Manhattan-Project build-out phase, where factories can’t produce compute fast enough. In that world, it isn’t winner-take-all; it’s a multi-lane superhighway where every hyperscaler gets its own toll booth. There’s simply too much need, too much capex, too much training pressure for actual cannibalization to matter at this stage. can nudge its way into the ring, sure — but is still the titleholder, defending a belt nobody else can quite lift.
Still, the more interesting tectonic shift isn’t Nvidia’s rebound — it’s the emerging Hassett effect. Bloomberg reporting has Kevin Hassett, Trump’s NEC director, as the leading contender for Fed chair. Prediction markets — both Polymarket and Kalshi — have nudged him toward 56–57%, giving him a meaningful lead over Waller, Warsh, and BlackRock’s Rick Rieder. And the logic is painfully simple: Trump wants a loyalist this time. Powell’s 2017 independence taught him a lesson he doesn’t plan to repeat. He wants someone whose loyalty won’t drift. Hassett fits that bill. Not because he’s the best communicator — he isn’t — but because he is the one candidate whose alignment with the White House is clearest.
And that’s why markets have leaned dovish, driven by a continuous storyline. A Hassett-led Fed implicitly means faster cuts, a lower neutral rate, and a “growth-first, inflation-second” worldview. It’s oxygen for risk assets — especially the AI complex that drinks cheap capital like it’s running a marathon in July. The Treasury market hasn’t blown its doors off — 10-year yields are hanging around 4 % — but the direction is unmistakable: a softening, a leaning into policy ease, a recognition that Trump’s team wants a chair who won’t hesitate to push real yields even lower if that helps housing or amplifies the administration’s economic message.
This is the tell: the Hassett effect is less about who he is and more about what his nomination signals. Loyalty over independence. Policy alignment over academic caution. A Fed less constrained by orthodoxy and more willing to pursue growth without fearing immediate inflation blowback. For equities — particularly AI names — that’s rocket fuel.
And yet, the longer-dated bond market hasn’t fully bought the story. Long-run Fed Funds expectations have barely budged from the 2.75–3.00% trough pencilled in for early 2027. Treasuries are reacting, but not panicking. Markets have seen enough cycles to know that the chair you get and the chair they become are rarely the same person. Bernanke was George W. Bush’s “loyal pick” in 2005 — and then he walked into the worst financial inferno in modern history and ultimately became Barack Obama’s “ safe pick.” A Hassett Fed could end up following a similar arc: perceived loyalty today, forced independence tomorrow.
So heading into Thanksgiving, the macro landscape looks exactly as a trader would expect with a hopeful view of a dovish Fed regime: a market lifting on expectations of rate cuts thermals, a market recoupling to the dovish impulse, an AI complex rediscovering its swagger, a VIX asleep at the wheel, a dollar drifting lower, and a bond market quietly absorbing the idea of a more politically aligned Federal Reserve. The feast has started early — but the real meal, the December FOMC and the first accurate Hassett stress tests, hasn’t even hit the table yet.