Close Menu
Invest Insider News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Monday, August 10
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Invest Insider News
    • Home
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Finance
    • Investing
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    • Utilities
    Invest Insider News
    Home»Utilities»SC utilities’ duties, Statehouse votes, be informed voters | Letters to the Editor
    Utilities

    SC utilities’ duties, Statehouse votes, be informed voters | Letters to the Editor

    October 13, 20244 Mins Read


    SC utilities’ duties

    Editorial writer Cindi Ross Scoppe’s recent column critiquing utility companies’ attempts to charge customers upfront for unbuilt power plants is compelling, and her skepticism is well-founded.

    Unlike businesses such as restaurants, car manufacturers and farmers, utility companies face no competition.

    State laws mandate that customers buy electricity from their assigned provider, creating a captive market. This dynamic gives utilities an unfair advantage, ensuring guaranteed profits without the usual financial risks other industries face. This underscores the need for regulatory changes to level the playing field.

    The proposal for “capital cost tracking,” which allows utilities to charge customers during plant construction, is particularly concerning.

    History has shown the dangers of this model, notably with the failed V.C. Summer nuclear project, where billions were spent on a plant that never produced electricity.

    Ratepayers continue to shoulder the costs of that failure, an unambiguous and direct result of incentivizing delays and cost overruns. Allowing utilities to charge upfront encourages similar inefficiencies, transferring the financial burden onto consumers who have no choice but to pay.

    By shielding utilities from risk, this system undermines the principle of accountability that other industries operate under.

    If a restaurant fails to attract customers, it bears the loss. In contrast, utilities under the proposed system would profit even if their projects fail.

    Ms. Scoppe rightly argues that this arrangement would be unjust, placing undue financial strain on consumers while absolving utilities of responsibility for prudent management.

    J.E. WALKER

    Johns Island

    Legislative failures

    The presidential election and the local sales tax referendum are receiving the most attention, but as Election Day approaches, South Carolinians should keep in mind the long list of truly awful decisions made by the General Assembly in recent sessions.

    The Legislature has:

    • Refused to consolidate health agencies to provide better, more efficient care.

    • Refused to pass a hate crimes bill or take steps that would hold private schools receiving public money to the kind of performance standards applied to public schools.

    • Failed to close loopholes in the DUI law despite South Carolina having among the highest traffic deaths per capita.

    • Killed a bill that would address scandalous predatory lending practices.

    • Once again refused to expand Medicaid, even though the federal government will pay more than 90% of the cost.

    The record of what the Legislature did is just as bad: banning gender-affirming care and allowing anyone over age 18 without a criminal record to carry a handgun — openly or concealed — without training or a permit.

    And of course, the state treasurer lost track of $1.8 billion. We learned about this the year after the state’s comptroller general resigned after a $3.5 billion financial error was revealed. And the Legislature allowed SCE&G and Santee Cooper to squander $9 billion on a nuclear plant that never opened.

    Changing this appalling record would require what does not come naturally to most South Carolinians: voting Democrat. That’s because every single one of the recent decisions was the result of an overwhelming Republican majority that controls state government.

    PHILIP JOS

    Charleston

    Be ready to vote

    For those who have ever gone to vote only to discover their registration was inactive or they were unfamiliar with many candidates or issues on the ballot, there is an easy solution.

    The nonpartisan League of Women Voters’ website, vote411.org, offers information so voters can make informed choices.

    At vote411.org, residents can enter their address and will be taken to a page that gives them candidate statements of their positions in their own words, unedited.

    Visitors to the website also can see the wording and a clear, unbiased explanation of each referendum or constitutional amendment on their ballot. It’s tailored to each person’s address, so only that precinct’s candidates and ballot issues will be shown.

    Residents also can use this site to register, find their polling location and check their registration to be sure that moving, skipping an election or another problem hasn’t taken them off the active voter list.

    NANCY KREML

    Columbia

    Send us your letters

    What’s on your mind? Join our community conversations and let your voice be heard by writing a letter to the editor. Letters can be a maximum of 250 words, and are subject to editing for clarity, tone and libel. They must include the writer’s name and city for publication, and a daytime telephone number for verification. Email your submissions to letters@postandcourier.com or fill out the form on our online portal.





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleInterest Rates Just Did Something They Haven’t Done Since March 2020, and It Could Foreshadow a Big Move in the Stock Market
    Next Article Brookfield Renewable announces new agreement By Investing.com

    Related Posts

    Utilities

    United Utilities named in top 100 apprenticeship employers

    August 10, 2026
    Utilities

    United Utilities in Top 100 apprenticeship employers

    August 8, 2026
    Utilities

    Utilities Down as Flight From Sector Continued — Utilities Roundup

    August 5, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How is the UK Commercial Property Market Performing?

    December 31, 2000

    How much are they in different states across the US?

    December 31, 2000

    A Guide To Becoming A Property Developer

    December 31, 2000
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Bitcoin

    US-Iran peace talks accelerate after Apache helicopter shootdown, with Bitcoin emerging as unlikely diplomatic tool

    June 13, 2026
    Bitcoin

    Peter Brandt Reveals His Bearish Bitcoin (BTC) View

    July 21, 2024
    Utilities

    Springfield City Utilities linemen work to restore power in Florida after Hurricane Milton

    October 12, 2024
    What's Hot

    Diversifying retirement savings with alternative assets

    July 22, 2025

    Understanding Traders: Roles, Strategies, and Skills

    August 25, 2025

    UK finance company plunges into administration – loans over £900 | UK | News

    February 13, 2026
    Most Popular

    Metals Price Discovery Is Shifting East, Driving Volatility

    February 6, 2026

    USA: baisse plus marquée qu’attendu des stocks de pétrole

    May 7, 2025

    All-day stock trading is risky inevitability  

    July 21, 2026
    Editor's Picks

    SEC Approves Spot Bitcoin ETF Options Trading On NYSE, Cboe

    October 19, 2024

    PropertyStream and Offr Launch TRANSACT as UK Homebuying Enters the Digital Era

    July 12, 2026

    Prediction: Bitcoin Will Not Be Worth $1 Million in 5 Years

    January 12, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 Invest Insider News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.