Close Menu
Invest Insider News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Sunday, October 26
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Invest Insider News
    • Home
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Finance
    • Investing
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    • Utilities
    Invest Insider News
    Home»Utilities»SC utilities’ duties, Statehouse votes, be informed voters | Letters to the Editor
    Utilities

    SC utilities’ duties, Statehouse votes, be informed voters | Letters to the Editor

    October 13, 20244 Mins Read


    SC utilities’ duties

    Editorial writer Cindi Ross Scoppe’s recent column critiquing utility companies’ attempts to charge customers upfront for unbuilt power plants is compelling, and her skepticism is well-founded.

    Unlike businesses such as restaurants, car manufacturers and farmers, utility companies face no competition.

    State laws mandate that customers buy electricity from their assigned provider, creating a captive market. This dynamic gives utilities an unfair advantage, ensuring guaranteed profits without the usual financial risks other industries face. This underscores the need for regulatory changes to level the playing field.

    The proposal for “capital cost tracking,” which allows utilities to charge customers during plant construction, is particularly concerning.

    History has shown the dangers of this model, notably with the failed V.C. Summer nuclear project, where billions were spent on a plant that never produced electricity.

    Ratepayers continue to shoulder the costs of that failure, an unambiguous and direct result of incentivizing delays and cost overruns. Allowing utilities to charge upfront encourages similar inefficiencies, transferring the financial burden onto consumers who have no choice but to pay.

    By shielding utilities from risk, this system undermines the principle of accountability that other industries operate under.

    If a restaurant fails to attract customers, it bears the loss. In contrast, utilities under the proposed system would profit even if their projects fail.

    Ms. Scoppe rightly argues that this arrangement would be unjust, placing undue financial strain on consumers while absolving utilities of responsibility for prudent management.

    J.E. WALKER

    Johns Island

    Legislative failures

    The presidential election and the local sales tax referendum are receiving the most attention, but as Election Day approaches, South Carolinians should keep in mind the long list of truly awful decisions made by the General Assembly in recent sessions.

    The Legislature has:

    • Refused to consolidate health agencies to provide better, more efficient care.

    • Refused to pass a hate crimes bill or take steps that would hold private schools receiving public money to the kind of performance standards applied to public schools.

    • Failed to close loopholes in the DUI law despite South Carolina having among the highest traffic deaths per capita.

    • Killed a bill that would address scandalous predatory lending practices.

    • Once again refused to expand Medicaid, even though the federal government will pay more than 90% of the cost.

    The record of what the Legislature did is just as bad: banning gender-affirming care and allowing anyone over age 18 without a criminal record to carry a handgun — openly or concealed — without training or a permit.

    And of course, the state treasurer lost track of $1.8 billion. We learned about this the year after the state’s comptroller general resigned after a $3.5 billion financial error was revealed. And the Legislature allowed SCE&G and Santee Cooper to squander $9 billion on a nuclear plant that never opened.

    Changing this appalling record would require what does not come naturally to most South Carolinians: voting Democrat. That’s because every single one of the recent decisions was the result of an overwhelming Republican majority that controls state government.

    PHILIP JOS

    Charleston

    Be ready to vote

    For those who have ever gone to vote only to discover their registration was inactive or they were unfamiliar with many candidates or issues on the ballot, there is an easy solution.

    The nonpartisan League of Women Voters’ website, vote411.org, offers information so voters can make informed choices.

    At vote411.org, residents can enter their address and will be taken to a page that gives them candidate statements of their positions in their own words, unedited.

    Visitors to the website also can see the wording and a clear, unbiased explanation of each referendum or constitutional amendment on their ballot. It’s tailored to each person’s address, so only that precinct’s candidates and ballot issues will be shown.

    Residents also can use this site to register, find their polling location and check their registration to be sure that moving, skipping an election or another problem hasn’t taken them off the active voter list.

    NANCY KREML

    Columbia

    Send us your letters

    What’s on your mind? Join our community conversations and let your voice be heard by writing a letter to the editor. Letters can be a maximum of 250 words, and are subject to editing for clarity, tone and libel. They must include the writer’s name and city for publication, and a daytime telephone number for verification. Email your submissions to letters@postandcourier.com or fill out the form on our online portal.





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleInterest Rates Just Did Something They Haven’t Done Since March 2020, and It Could Foreshadow a Big Move in the Stock Market
    Next Article Brookfield Renewable announces new agreement By Investing.com

    Related Posts

    Utilities

    Supermarkets, utilities, and fuel firms go into storm mode ahead of Melissa

    October 23, 2025
    Utilities

    Utilities companies told to tidy up ‘graffiti’ cabinets

    October 23, 2025
    Utilities

    Utilities Flat on Cyclical Bias — Utilities Roundup

    October 23, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How is the UK Commercial Property Market Performing?

    December 31, 2000

    How much are they in different states across the US?

    December 31, 2000

    A Guide To Becoming A Property Developer

    December 31, 2000
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Stock Market

    Wall Street rises toward records as banks rally and Tesla tumbles

    October 11, 2024
    Property

    Beautiful UK seaside town from BBC Beyond Paradise where ‘nearly every home is empty’

    August 30, 2025
    Stock Market

    Will the Stock Market Crash or Soar Under President-Elect Donald Trump? Here’s What History Shows.

    January 19, 2025
    What's Hot

    Nvidia beat earnings expectations again. Investors aren’t impressed

    August 28, 2024

    Bitcoin Eyes 94 000 $ après que Trump ne déclare aucune intention de tirer une chaise nourrie

    April 23, 2025

    US House Prices Hit All Time High

    July 8, 2024
    Most Popular

    Bitcoin at $111,888 as XRP and Solana Rally

    September 8, 2025

    China enhances credit financing services for small businesses

    April 2, 2025

    Bitcoin Braced For $25 Trillion Price Earthquake As Deutsche Bank Issues Huge Fed Prediction

    September 27, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    Bitcoin $120K Target Draws Near As Fed Makes A Choice

    September 16, 2025

    Hawaiian Electric raises going concern risk over Maui wildfire settlement financing

    August 11, 2024

    UK GDP: Fastest Growth in Q1 2025

    June 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2025 Invest Insider News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.