Close Menu
Invest Insider News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Saturday, March 7
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Invest Insider News
    • Home
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Finance
    • Investing
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    • Utilities
    Invest Insider News
    Home»Finance»FCA signals potential changes to motor finance compensation scheme after industry backlash
    Finance

    FCA signals potential changes to motor finance compensation scheme after industry backlash

    March 4, 20263 Mins Read


    The UK’s financial regulator is aiming to “streamline” its long-awaited motor finance compensation scheme following extensive industry backlash.

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a fresh update to markets on Wednesday, stating it was reviewing over 1,000 responses to its proposals for the sector-wide redress scheme.

    It added that “if” it were to proceed with a scheme, the regulator was “likely to make several changes”.

    In its Wednesday update, the FCA stated it would streamline the process for consumers and firms by eliminating the opt-out options and replacing them with a three-month deadline for lenders to inform consumers what they are owed and how much.

    Consumers receiving an offer would also be able to accept it immediately, rather than waiting for the final determination, as reported by City AM.

    Firms would also no longer be required to write to customers via recorded delivery, which the regulator said would open new communication channels to best meet consumers’ needs.

    The FCA stated: “If we do go ahead [with the scheme], we expect to publish final rules in late March.”

    Earlier this year, Britain’s leading banks were believed to have been given some relief after the Supreme Court upheld two out of three appeals from lenders in the landmark car finance scandal.

    But the latter half of the year delivered a succession of dramatic developments in the saga, with the FCA revealing proposals for a controversial redress scheme that prompted banks to substantially increase their provisions for compensation.

    One of the principal areas of criticism regarding the FCA’s scheme centres on the determination of “unfair” – the benchmark the Supreme Court upheld in the single successful claimant’s case.

    The highest Court ruled in favour of one of three claimants after determining their excessive commission of 55 per cent was “unfair”. However, the FCA has stated the threshold for its redress – where 14.2m agreements are estimated to be eligible – will be 35 per cent.

    The scheme in its current form presents lenders with a bill of approximately £11bn – still a substantial sum but significantly below previous projections of £44bn once feared by the City. Roughly 14.2m agreements will qualify for the scheme, extending back to 2007 – a timeframe which has encountered fierce resistance from the industry.

    The regulator was compelled to extend the deadline for submitting feedback for the motor finance redress scheme last year as opposition from both consumer and lending camps intensified.

    Lloyds Banking Group – which owns Britain’s largest car finance provider Black Horse – was obliged to raise provisions to £2bn from £1.2bn after particulars of the scheme emerged in October. FTSE 250 lender Close Brothers nearly doubled its reserves to £300m and Barclays almost quadrupled its provisions to £325m.

    Santander UK abandoned its third-quarter results in October, referencing uncertainty within the motor finance sector, as bank chief Mike Regnier urged the government to consider intervening to help mediate. He warned if the government does not intervene “the unintended consequences for the car finance market, the supply of credit and the resulting negative impact on the automotive industry and its supply chain could significantly impact jobs, growth and the broader UK economy.”

    There has also been equivalent opposition on the consumer side, with the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Fair Banking condemning the City watchdog for a “£4.4bn gap” in the proposed scheme. The group accused the regulator of being “influenced by the profit margins of the lenders”.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleRenewed ETF inflows send BTC above $71,000, offsetting war uncertainty
    Next Article Stock Market Crash Highlights: Sensex slumps 1,122 points, Nifty 50 ends below 24,500

    Related Posts

    Finance

    Leading Finance Podcasts for Beginners in the UK (2026 Guide)

    March 6, 2026
    Finance

    The AI maturity model for audit and finance: Your step-by-step path to meaningful AI adoption

    March 5, 2026
    Finance

    New Crypto Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Reports V1 Protocol Progress as Roadmap Enters Phase 3

    March 4, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How is the UK Commercial Property Market Performing?

    December 31, 2000

    How much are they in different states across the US?

    December 31, 2000

    A Guide To Becoming A Property Developer

    December 31, 2000
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Commodities

    Tether Moves to Invest €1B in German AI Robotics Firm Neura

    November 15, 2025
    Utilities

    This Utilities Stock Beat the S&P 500 in the First Half of 2024. Is It Still a Buy?

    July 24, 2024
    Bitcoin

    Ozak AI’s $0.012 Entry vs Bitcoin’s $123K and Ethereum’s $4,551 Price Tags

    October 15, 2025
    What's Hot

    Les signaux de divergence flash rouges: Bitcoin se dirige-t-il vers un renversement en juin?

    May 30, 2025

    Property Management Company Won’t Fix Their Air Conditioning In The Peak Of Summer, So They Planted A Bunch Of Invasive Flowers To Get Back At Them » TwistedSifter

    August 12, 2024

    Bitcoin Price Prediction: Expert Sees $100,000 In Just 3 Months, Citing Key Indicator

    August 29, 2024
    Most Popular

    Post-ETF Bitcoin Market: Who Controls Price Discovery? (2026 Analysis)

    February 27, 2026

    Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (NYSE:AQN) Receives Consensus Recommendation of “Hold” from Analysts

    August 12, 2024

    Revaluations to be conducted every 5 years

    June 12, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    Un développeur de Bitcoin propose des changements majeurs pour protéger le BTC des menaces quantiques.

    April 5, 2025

    Bitcoin And Crypto Are Quietly Braced For A ‘Monstrous’ BlackRock ETF Price Earthquake

    August 4, 2025

    Bitcoin Price at $118,722 as SOL and XRP Decline Sharply

    July 28, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 Invest Insider News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.