Hackers have absconded with more than $100 million worth of Bitcoin from thousands of supposedly secure accounts in recent days, setting up another scandal for investors who have been repeatedly preyed upon by thieves in the sector.
The latest missing money stems from a software flaw in what’s known as a “cold” Bitcoin wallet hosted by Canada-based Coinkite. Cold wallets have physical hardware associated with them alongside private passwords, or “keys,” intended to add an extra layer of security beyond the typical lengthy codes that nonetheless frequently get hacked.
Read:
Hacked bitcoin wallet maker warns AI failed to detect bug
Yet, Coinkite notified users late last week that some wallets using its Coldcard devices had been compromised. By Monday, more than 1 755 tokens worth around $110 million had been drained from 5 000 wallets, according to Galaxy Research.
The breach led to an understandable level of hysteria on social media, not to mention those whose Bitcoin was suddenly, inexplicably gone.
“The moment it loaded I knew I was screwed because I saw red lines for withdrawals,” Jonathan Goodman, one of the victims, told Bloomberg News. “Between 9:36 and 9:43 p.m. on July 29th, all three of my wallets were completely drained.”
Goodman says he lost $1.6 million due to the attack.
Here is how the hack happened, according to cryptocurrency experts and Coinkite itself.
ADVERTISEMENT
CONTINUE READING BELOW
A flaw in the software of the Coldcard devices meant that the generated “seed phrase” — a long string of words used to gain access to a wallet — was predictable, according to a report from Block Inc.’s engineering team.
The core of the issue was how Coinkite implemented the random-number generator when producing the phrases, according to Block. True randomness is a critical component of cryptographic security, but Coldcard wallets had a fallback mechanism that resulted in keys being generated using simpler values, such as the device serial numbers.
Read:
Hackers target bitcoin’s safest hiding place in ongoing attack
The result was that attackers have been able to systematically recalculate and drain user wallets. Reports on Friday placed losses at around $38 million, but the figures quickly climbed over the weekend into Monday. Bitcoin was little changed at around $63,800.
“It’s a reminder that self-custody is only as strong as the processes used to generate and protect private keys,” said Ayesha Kiani, chief operating officer at digital-asset investment firm Monarq Asset Management.
In a statement on its website, Coinkite confirmed that funds were still at risk. The company offered a new version of special software for customers, after some had gotten locked out of their devices.
The attack has drawn widespread attention online, with influencers to company executives weighing in on the implications.
“It exposes the fallacy of your crypto being offline,” said Aneirin Flynn, chief executive officer of cybersecurity technology firm Failsafe. “The device is just responsible for generating your passwords, and if the underlying math is broken then your passwords can be reverse-engineered.”
ADVERTISEMENT:
CONTINUE READING BELOW
For 2026 so far, the amount of crypto stolen is down from last year. The first half of the year has seen total losses reach $972 million, less than half of the $2.3 billion stolen during the first half of 2025, according to a TRM Labs report published last month. Still, the total number of hacks climbed to 207, the highest recorded in any six-month period.
Perhaps the most offensive part to affected Bitcoin holders is that they thought they were using the safest option out there to protect their investments.
Read: When a cold wallet isn’t so cold: Lessons from the $90m bitcoin theft
Tim Lamb, managing director at EquityEdge Studio, pleaded with authorities to find the culprits in an X post, saying the two Bitcoin he held were intended to give his children “a good start in life,” calling the losses a “terrible blow.”
For Goodman, the incident highlighted how much “blind faith” he has put in the technology he uses. He would not be investing in Bitcoin or using cold wallets going forward, he said.
“If it really is this complicated and technical, perhaps it’s not worth doing,” Goodman said. “Nobody knows how basically anything works.”
© 2026 Bloomberg