Next year’s setup is less about having answers and more about asking the right questions before the market realizes they matter. December is when that instinct sharpens. The tape slows, bid-to-offer liquidity thins, and traders retreat into back channels, encrypted chats, late-night calls, and half-serious forecasts about what will actually carry risk once the year rolls over.
Strip away the seasonal noise, and a small set of structural debates keeps resurfacing. At a gathering over the weekend in Hua Hin, five questions emerged that I think will frame how we think about markets next year. Think of them as stress fractures under the surface. They are not visible every day, but when pressure builds, price eventually finds them.
The first fault line runs straight through the heart of the AI story. The market has already paid for the steel, concrete, and silicon. That trade is well owned. The next phase is not about who spends the most, but who turns spending into lift. Productivity and margins are the real prize now. History indicates that this is where cycles distinguish leaders from tourists: adoption speed matters.
Workflow redesign matters more. Regulation and market structure decide who keeps the spoils. Private equity is already running this playbook, using AI to squeeze efficiency out of low-margin businesses where small gains compound fast. Public markets will follow, but not evenly. The likely outcome is an increase in valuation dispersion, with true adopters earning multiple expansions while the rest fade quietly into index drag.
The second fault line is where AI steps off the screen and onto the factory floor. Robotics is the physical expression of intelligence. Once software grows arms and legs, its economic reach expands exponentially. Warehouses, farms, highways, ports, and assembly lines become the new user interface. Autonomous vehicles, humanoid machines, and task-specific robots are just different uniforms for the same force.
The bottlenecks are obvious. Real-world data is messy. Hardware does not scale like code. Legacy workflows resist intrusion. But geopolitics is acting as an accelerant. Robotics changes the math on reshoring and supply chain resilience, and that alone guarantees persistent capital flow regardless of sentiment swings.
The third fault line sits above asset classes and cuts across borders. Technology is no longer just a growth lever. It is hard power. The AI race has become effectively bipolar, with the United States and China competing across models, power supply, talent pools, semiconductors, and critical minerals. Europe is caught in the middle, trying to balance security, social commitments, and competitiveness while lifting defence spending and remaining tethered to Chinese supply chains. As AI, defence technology, and advanced manufacturing converge, neutrality becomes harder to maintain. Technology choices now carry geopolitical weight, and markets will increasingly price those trade-offs.
The fourth fault line is energy, quietly re-entering the narrative as a constraint rather than a footnote. After nearly two decades of flat-to-declining demand, the combination of data centers and reshoring is bending the curve upward. Electricity consumption is set to grow at a pace not seen since before 2000. This is not a marginal adjustment.
It reshapes the stack. gains relevance alongside renewables as the total pie expands. Oil demand does not collapse; it plateaus. At the same time, AI power needs are exposing grid fragility, pushing capital toward onsite generation, distributed power, storage, and private infrastructure. Energy ceases to be a legacy sector and reverts to behaving like strategic infrastructure again.
The final and the fifth fault line is demographic, slow-moving but relentless. Longer and healthier lifespans, increasingly supported by GLP one therapies and the prospect of oral formulations, are changing how people think about retirement, healthcare, and asset allocation.
At the other end, younger cohorts are stepping into a labour market shaped by AI, with tougher entry points and a more distant path to home ownership as older generations age in place. The bridge between those worlds is wealth transfer. Approximately 30% of wealth is held by those over 70, and a significant transfer is approaching. That transfer will ripple through consumption, housing, markets, and politics long before it shows up neatly in official data.
None of these questions resolves cleanly or quickly. They unfold over years, not quarters. But markets do not wait for certainty. They move when probabilities shift. As the calendar turns, these are the forces quietly loading the spring beneath the tape. Price action may look calm on the surface, but underneath, the ground is already moving.
Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.