Close Menu
Invest Insider News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Monday, February 23
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Invest Insider News
    • Home
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Finance
    • Investing
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    • Utilities
    Invest Insider News
    Home»Finance»Harvey Norman and Latitude Finance’s misleading advertising appeal shut down in court
    Finance

    Harvey Norman and Latitude Finance’s misleading advertising appeal shut down in court

    September 4, 20255 Mins Read


    Need to know

    • In 2022 ASIC launched a successful court case against Latitude Finance and Harvey Norman for failing to disclose the full terms of an interest-free finance offer
    • Prior to this, we awarded the lender and retailer a Shonky for similar reasons, as well as for offering instant credit at point-of-sale in the first place
    • Earlier this year, the Full Federal Court roundly dismissed the partnership’s flimsy appeal of the 2022 decision



    An offer of 60 months of interest-free credit can be especially compelling to people who don’t have the cash on hand to buy something they need. It has the whiff of free money. But in the case of the Latitude Finance and Harvey Norman partnership, important details were left out of the advertising campaign.

    It turned out that the interest-free offer involved signing up for a Latitude credit card – one that came with an initial cost as well as ongoing monthly fees. The advertisements neglected to mention this. They also didn’t explain that a single late payment would result in the loan going from interest-free to some of the highest interest rates on the market.

    The advertisements also didn’t explain that a single late payment would result in the loan going from interest-free to some of the highest interest rates on the market

    Handing out credit cards at point of sale without robust responsible lending checks is a practice that earned the lender and retailer a 2020 CHOICE Shonky. As part of that investigation, we profiled cases of Harvey Norman flogging Latitude credit cards at the checkout counter and encouraging customers to buy items on finance they didn’t need or ask for – we even found cases where salespeople suggested a $12,000 limit when the product being sold cost a fraction of that sum.

    By way of example, we also pointed out that making only the minimum repayments on a $5000 Harvey Norman Latitude Mastercard Go at 22.74% would mean paying $17,909 over the 29 years and eight months it would take to pay off the loan ($12,909 in interest).






    Grounds for appeal ‘barely arguable’

    In 2022, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) launched a court case against Latitude Finance and Harvey Norman for “pursuing a national advertising campaign which failed to adequately disclose the true scope and cost of the promoted payment method”.

    In October last year, the court ruled that the lender and retailer had broken the law, but Latitude Finance and Harvey Norman appealed the decision. In August this year the Full Federal Court knocked back the appeal and suggested it should have never been mounted.

    The court ruled that the grounds of appeal “lack merit and are barely arguable” and that it was “regrettable that the final determination of remedies in this proceeding has been delayed by the unmeritorious applications for leave to appeal”.

    ASIC took this case because we believed many consumers were unaware of the financial arrangements they were entering into, and they deserved to be fully informed

    ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court

    The legal team for Latitude Finance and Harvey Norman tried to convince the court that people seeing the advertisements would know there must be a catch and therefore they weren’t misleading. This didn’t fly with the court.

    “Ordinary and reasonable consumers would have assumed that the offer made in the advertisements was stated accurately, particularly in light of Australia’s strong consumer protection laws,” the court stated.

    “This is an important win for consumers. ASIC took this case because we believed many consumers were unaware of the financial arrangements they were entering into, and they deserved to be fully informed,” says ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court, adding that the decision “reinforces the importance of truthful advertising”.

    ASIC will be seeking court costs and financial penalties for Latitude Finance and Harvey Norman as well as an injunction against further misleading ads.








    Marg Rafferty Andy Kollmorgen and Jarni Blakkarly

    Get the inside story on our investigations into consumer rip-offs and bad business practices.

    Read our privacy policy






    Marg Rafferty Andy Kollmorgen and Jarni Blakkarly

    Get the inside story on our investigations into consumer rip-offs and bad business practices.

    Read our privacy policy






    We’re on your side

    For more than 60 years, we’ve been making a difference for Australian consumers. In that time, we’ve never taken ads or sponsorship.

    Instead we’re funded by members who value expert reviews and independent product testing.

    With no self-interest behind our advice, you don’t just buy smarter, you get the answers that you need.

    You know without hesitation what’s safe for you and your family. And our recent sunscreens test showed just how important it is to keep business claims in check.

    So you’ll never be alone when something goes wrong or a business treats you unfairly.

    Learn more about CHOICE membership today


    Stock images: Getty, unless otherwise stated.












    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBitcoin Needs To Overtake $112K To Evade New Lows
    Next Article Beijing intellectual property conference to focus on digital development

    Related Posts

    Finance

    Ministry of Finance issues UAE Electronic Invoicing Guidelines

    February 23, 2026
    Finance

    Supply Chain Finance Awards 2026: Global Winners

    February 23, 2026
    Finance

    Money Box – Motor Finance Claims and Pay by Bank

    February 21, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How is the UK Commercial Property Market Performing?

    December 31, 2000

    How much are they in different states across the US?

    December 31, 2000

    A Guide To Becoming A Property Developer

    December 31, 2000
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Property

    Near-term house sales expectations ‘at most positive level since January 2020’

    August 7, 2024
    Bitcoin

    Here’s the Next Target for BTC Before Bulls Can Hope for $70K

    July 21, 2024
    Bitcoin

    ECB Warns Bitcoin’s Rise Risks Societal Wealth Inequality

    October 20, 2024
    What's Hot

    UK house prices see second straight quarter of growth in 2025

    October 19, 2025

    Utilities Down as Traders Seek Out Risk – Utilities Roundup

    May 13, 2025

    Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq climb to records as sharp jobs revision sets stage for inflation data

    September 9, 2025
    Most Popular

    Lambert Smith Hampton promotes two associate directors at Belfast office

    February 16, 2026

    Bellway shares jump as homebuilder eyes increased completions in 2025 By Investing.com

    October 15, 2024

    Ganglong China Property Group Limited fournit des prévisions de bénéfices pour l’année se terminant le 31 décembre 2024 -Le 14 mars 2025 à 13:08

    March 14, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    The key races to watch in all 50 states

    October 30, 2024

    Stock markets mostly rise as US-UK trade agreement sparks investor confidence

    May 8, 2025

    Personal auto drives major recovery in US P&C underwriting for 2024: AM Best

    June 27, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 Invest Insider News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.