BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND – DECEMBER 13: A jewellery quarter gold dealer poses with three 1kg gold bullion bars. (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Gold just added roughly $1.6 trillion in market value in a single day – an amount approximately equal to bitcoin’s entire market capitalization. Meanwhile, bitcoin slid to its 2026 lows, hovering around $83,000 while gold sentiment gauges flashed “extreme greed.” For those who have pitched bitcoin as “digital gold,” this divergence demands explanation. The answer is simpler than most analysis suggests: it’s not so much a story about which asset is better as it is about who is buying.
Central banks have been accumulating gold at record levels, creating a structural bid that did not exist a decade ago. Those same institutions are not yet in the bitcoin market. When they arrive – and the infrastructure is being built right now – bitcoin will have the same tailwind that is currently propelling gold to all-time highs.
The Marginal Buyer Problem
Markets are set at the margin. The price of any asset reflects the behavior of the marginal buyer, i.e., the person or entity that triggers the next dollar coming in or going out. For gold, those marginal buyers have increasingly become central banks themselves.
According to the World Gold Council, central bank gold purchases have remained elevated since 2022, with institutions adding over 1,000 tonnes annually for three consecutive years. The largest, most powerful banks on the planet are diversifying away from dollar-denominated reserves in an era of weaponized finance and ballooning U.S. debt.
Bitcoin has no comparable institutional bid. The largest holders remain individuals, corporations like MicroStrategy, and the spot ETFs that have accumulated nearly 1.5 million bitcoins since their January 2024 launch. These are significant players, but they are not central banks. They do not control the enormous pools of capital that move gold markets.
The divergence, then, is not an indication that bitcoin has failed as a store of value, just that it has not yet attracted the buyer class that is currently driving gold.
Bitcoin Financial Infrastructure: A Work In Progress
This is changing faster than most observers appreciate.
The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve established by executive order in March 2025 signaled that the U.S. government views bitcoin as a strategic asset worth holding rather than selling. The reserve currently holds approximately 200,000 bitcoins it collected from asset seizures, but the executive order also includes provisions for budget-neutral strategies to acquire more. The U.S. Treasury is not actively buying on the open market, but it could theoretically begin at any time.
More significant was this week’s statement from SEC Chair Paul Atkins that the “time is right” for pension funds to include digital assets in their portfolios. CFTC Chair Mike Selig echoed the sentiment, noting that both agencies are working with Congress on market structure legislation. The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced that bill through committee this week – the first time such legislation has cleared that hurdle.
The path from “pension funds can hold bitcoin” to “central banks hold bitcoin” is shorter than it appears. Pension funds and sovereign wealth funds often share mandates, consultants, and investment frameworks. When the former moves, the latter watches closely.
What The Gold Rally Teaches Us About Bitcoin
Gold’s current rally is instructive precisely because it shows what happens when sovereign capital decides it needs hard assets.
The yellow metal spent much of the 2010s range-bound, frustrating gold bugs who believed the post-2008 monetary expansion would drive prices higher immediately. It didn’t, because the marginal buyer during that period was retail investors and ETF holders, not central banks. Prices moved on sentiment and speculation rather than structural demand.
That changed after 2022. Sanctions on Russian reserves demonstrated that dollar-denominated assets could be frozen at will. Central banks, particularly those outside the Western alliance, began diversifying in earnest. The result is the elevated prices we see today with gold at $5,300.
Bitcoin is where gold was a decade ago: held primarily by believers and speculators, with institutional infrastructure still being constructed. The difference is that bitcoin’s infrastructure is being built far more rapidly than gold’s ever was.
Critics will argue that bitcoin’s failure to rally alongside gold proves it is not, in fact, digital gold. This misses the point entirely. Bitcoin and gold share fundamental properties – they are both bearer assets with strong resistance to debasement. What they do not share, yet, is the same buyer base. Gold has central banks. Bitcoin has MicroStrategy.
Divergence Between Bitcoin And Gold Proves The Thesis Of Both
This is not a permanent condition. The BITCOIN Act, if passed, would direct the U.S. Treasury to acquire one million bitcoin over five years. State-level strategic reserves are proliferating, with Texas having already passed enabling legislation. The infrastructure for sovereign bitcoin accumulation exists; what remains is political will and time.
When central banks begin accumulating bitcoin with the same urgency they currently show for gold, the asset will experience the same structural bid. The difference is that bitcoin’s supply is genuinely fixed – not merely difficult to increase, as gold’s is, but mathematically limited to 21 million units. The supply shock from sovereign accumulation will be correspondingly more severe.
Patience, Not Panic
The current divergence between gold and bitcoin is uncomfortable for those who hold both or who have argued for bitcoin’s monetary properties. But discomfort is not the same as disconfirmation.
Gold’s rally demonstrates that the market for hard assets is alive and growing. Central banks are diversifying away from fiat reserves at a pace not seen in generations. This is precisely the macro environment in which bitcoin was designed to thrive. The only missing ingredient is the institutional buyer — and that buyer is being cultivated through regulatory clarity, custody solutions, and the slow accretion of precedent.
Central banks aren’t buying bitcoin. Applying Occam’s razor, this simple fact is likely the culprit for the divergence between bitcoin and gold in the current market. Central banks aren’t buying bitcoin. Gold’s current rally shows exactly what sovereign demand does to a hard asset – and bitcoin is the harder one.