Close Menu
Invest Insider News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Thursday, April 23
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Invest Insider News
    • Home
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Finance
    • Investing
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    • Utilities
    Invest Insider News
    Home»Utilities»SC utilities’ duties, Statehouse votes, be informed voters | Letters to the Editor
    Utilities

    SC utilities’ duties, Statehouse votes, be informed voters | Letters to the Editor

    October 13, 20244 Mins Read


    SC utilities’ duties

    Editorial writer Cindi Ross Scoppe’s recent column critiquing utility companies’ attempts to charge customers upfront for unbuilt power plants is compelling, and her skepticism is well-founded.

    Unlike businesses such as restaurants, car manufacturers and farmers, utility companies face no competition.

    State laws mandate that customers buy electricity from their assigned provider, creating a captive market. This dynamic gives utilities an unfair advantage, ensuring guaranteed profits without the usual financial risks other industries face. This underscores the need for regulatory changes to level the playing field.

    The proposal for “capital cost tracking,” which allows utilities to charge customers during plant construction, is particularly concerning.

    History has shown the dangers of this model, notably with the failed V.C. Summer nuclear project, where billions were spent on a plant that never produced electricity.

    Ratepayers continue to shoulder the costs of that failure, an unambiguous and direct result of incentivizing delays and cost overruns. Allowing utilities to charge upfront encourages similar inefficiencies, transferring the financial burden onto consumers who have no choice but to pay.

    By shielding utilities from risk, this system undermines the principle of accountability that other industries operate under.

    If a restaurant fails to attract customers, it bears the loss. In contrast, utilities under the proposed system would profit even if their projects fail.

    Ms. Scoppe rightly argues that this arrangement would be unjust, placing undue financial strain on consumers while absolving utilities of responsibility for prudent management.

    J.E. WALKER

    Johns Island

    Legislative failures

    The presidential election and the local sales tax referendum are receiving the most attention, but as Election Day approaches, South Carolinians should keep in mind the long list of truly awful decisions made by the General Assembly in recent sessions.

    The Legislature has:

    • Refused to consolidate health agencies to provide better, more efficient care.

    • Refused to pass a hate crimes bill or take steps that would hold private schools receiving public money to the kind of performance standards applied to public schools.

    • Failed to close loopholes in the DUI law despite South Carolina having among the highest traffic deaths per capita.

    • Killed a bill that would address scandalous predatory lending practices.

    • Once again refused to expand Medicaid, even though the federal government will pay more than 90% of the cost.

    The record of what the Legislature did is just as bad: banning gender-affirming care and allowing anyone over age 18 without a criminal record to carry a handgun — openly or concealed — without training or a permit.

    And of course, the state treasurer lost track of $1.8 billion. We learned about this the year after the state’s comptroller general resigned after a $3.5 billion financial error was revealed. And the Legislature allowed SCE&G and Santee Cooper to squander $9 billion on a nuclear plant that never opened.

    Changing this appalling record would require what does not come naturally to most South Carolinians: voting Democrat. That’s because every single one of the recent decisions was the result of an overwhelming Republican majority that controls state government.

    PHILIP JOS

    Charleston

    Be ready to vote

    For those who have ever gone to vote only to discover their registration was inactive or they were unfamiliar with many candidates or issues on the ballot, there is an easy solution.

    The nonpartisan League of Women Voters’ website, vote411.org, offers information so voters can make informed choices.

    At vote411.org, residents can enter their address and will be taken to a page that gives them candidate statements of their positions in their own words, unedited.

    Visitors to the website also can see the wording and a clear, unbiased explanation of each referendum or constitutional amendment on their ballot. It’s tailored to each person’s address, so only that precinct’s candidates and ballot issues will be shown.

    Residents also can use this site to register, find their polling location and check their registration to be sure that moving, skipping an election or another problem hasn’t taken them off the active voter list.

    NANCY KREML

    Columbia

    Send us your letters

    What’s on your mind? Join our community conversations and let your voice be heard by writing a letter to the editor. Letters can be a maximum of 250 words, and are subject to editing for clarity, tone and libel. They must include the writer’s name and city for publication, and a daytime telephone number for verification. Email your submissions to letters@postandcourier.com or fill out the form on our online portal.





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleInterest Rates Just Did Something They Haven’t Done Since March 2020, and It Could Foreshadow a Big Move in the Stock Market
    Next Article Brookfield Renewable announces new agreement By Investing.com

    Related Posts

    Utilities

    UK Utilities Risk Report 2026

    April 22, 2026
    Utilities

    Is the Vanguard Utilities ETF the Smartest Income Play Right Now?

    April 21, 2026
    Utilities

    United Utilities to give update on Windermere Programme

    April 20, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How is the UK Commercial Property Market Performing?

    December 31, 2000

    How much are they in different states across the US?

    December 31, 2000

    A Guide To Becoming A Property Developer

    December 31, 2000
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Investing

    Elon Musk wants Tesla to invest $5 billion into his newest startup, xAI — if shareholders approve

    July 24, 2024
    Bitcoin

    Les conseillers financiers restent hésitants envers le bitcoin – mais ne le seront pas longtemps

    June 11, 2025
    Property

    China’s surprise resilience aids copper as global risks mount

    April 23, 2025
    What's Hot

    GameStop Moves 4,710 Bitcoin Signaling Potential Sale

    January 23, 2026

    Clearmont Council Discusses Rate Increases for Utilities – Sheridan Media

    July 16, 2024

    Earnings Preview: Hormel and Alibaba Carry D Ratings While Walmart Holds Strong

    February 17, 2026
    Most Popular

    Shanghai relaxes home-buying rules as China’s property market struggles

    August 25, 2025

    MicroStrategy Co-Founder Michael Saylor Owns Around $1,000,000,000 in Bitcoin (BTC): Report

    August 8, 2024

    Citi and IFC Partner on Sustainable Supply Chain Finance Program

    August 7, 2024
    Editor's Picks

    LE POINT CRYPTOS : Le bitcoin progresse, le dossier commercial toujours au coeur de l’attention

    June 3, 2025

    Bitcoin Price Prediction Amid U.S.–China Trade and Fed Rate Cut

    October 20, 2025

    Trump’s Gaza ‘Riviera’ echoes Kushner waterfront property dreams

    February 5, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 Invest Insider News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.